janvier 25, 2009

Huge mosque build given go-ahead, northen London

Filed under: Uncategorized — sementic @ 6:02

Huge mosque build given go-ahead

24 July, 2009

Plans for the construction of a five-storey building which will be one of London’s biggest mosques have been given the go-ahead.

Harrow Central Mosque will serve Muslim worshippers from across north London when it is built on Station Road. The designs include a 40m-high minaret, a gym, a crèche and a café within the 5,745 square metre development.

It is expected to open next year after Harrow Council approved changes to the original plans, which were passed in June 2000.

The planning committee has imposed conditions on the build, which include that a house on Station Road currently being used as the mosque is turned into affordable housing. The Mosque builders will also pay £15,000 towards controlled parking measures in Rosslyn Crescent.

Councillor Marilyn Ashton, cabinet member for planning, development and enterprise, said: “This is a very significant building on Harrow’s skyline and while permission was given some while ago, it was important we regularised changes that had been made. I’m pleased that we have been able to give formal permission while at the same time balancing that with the views of local residents.”

« Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers. »

Recep Tayyip Erdogan, President of Turkey, 1997

Is this what you are planning for us Councillor Marilyn Ashton and officials of Harrow Borough Council?

It will not be forgotten!

Hugh Fitzgerald

Yes, there is a mosque in The Hague. And all over Rotterdam, and Amsterdam, and in Paris and Marseilles and Lyons and Toulouse, in London and Manchester and Birmingham and Leeds, in Rome and in Milan, in Berlin and Hamburg and Frankfurt, and in thousands of other cities and even small towns all over Europe. The Saudis and other rich Arabs fund them, just as they pay for the land, and the construction, and the maintenance, of mosques all over this country, from Boston to sunny California. Most of the mosques in the Western world are not paid for by the locals, but by very rich foreign Muslims — governments, institutions, individuals.

After all, not all of that ten trillion dollars in oil revenues that Muslim states have received since 1973 alone goes for arms purchases, and palaces for the boys, and wages for those millions of non-Muslim wage-slaves who keep Saudi Arabia and the smaller sheikdoms going, and gambling in London and Monte Carlo, and call girls (the Arabs especially contemptuous of the West for allowing « their women » to be bought and used in such a way, by their sworn enemies, the Arab Muslims), and endless shopping in the funfair-cum-brothel of Europe.

Occasionally local opposition can stop the building of a mosque, but not because the mosque has been paid for by sinister foreigners, nor because mosques are far more than merely religious establishments but politico-religious outposts of the Army of Islam, and inevitably, unless subject to constant round-the-clock monitoring, will tend to have khutbas based on the almost-unavoidable subject with which the Qur’an and Hadith are full: to wit, the permanent state of war that exists between Believers and Infidels, and the need for Muslims to work to remove all obstacles to the spread, and dominance, of Islam.

Western governments simply will not stop to examine, will not dare even to discuss, the nature, the meaning, the menace of Islam and Jihad. Those whose duty it is to protect us will continue to pretend that what goes on in mosques is as « religious » in nature as what goes on in churches or synagogues. But it isn’t. Visits to mosques, or tapes of what goes on, or the testimony of those who have jettisoned Islam but can still recall what they heard (or if their faces are not recognized, enter mosques still) confirm that what goes on is dangerous to Infidels, to their legal and political institutions, to their physical security.

The national governments of the Western world have failed those whom they are supposed to protect. They have failed to exhibit any intelligent curiosity about Islam as a Total Belief-System, and the role of the mosques as a basis for Jihad — that is, the « struggle » to promote Islam and remove all obstacles to its spread, and dominance. Yet local governments, or local officials, have been forced to change or cancel permits by aroused citizens, who have made their cases against this or that mosque on the basis of size — the proposed mega-mosque in London appears to have been stopped — rather than on the basis of the bristling and aggressive nature of these huge structures, their minarets rising like missiles (as Erdogan once famously said).

If more non-Muslims came to understand the texts and tenets and attitudes of Islam, they would not be so uninterested in the mosque-building that goes on, sometimes even with the aid of local governments (e.g., Mayor Menino encouraging the building of the Boston Mosque, and even agreeing to sell land far below the market price), but would move heaven and earth to stop as many such projects as possible, and what’s more, to make sure that existing mosques and madrasas are monitored for the contents of what they preach (and what Muslims practice, when they are in a position to do so). The word « religion » keeps getting in the way, but greater knowledge would give Infidels the confidence not to be bamboozled or impressed by such a word, and determined not to be deterred in their opposition to mosques and madrasas. For the first is not simply, or mainly, a house of individual worship, but a center where a collectivist and aggressive Total Belief-System can more easily maintain or reinforce its hold over local Believers.


Applying the good old SITA method inspired by Amnesty International: a letter in a stamped envelope, sent by snail mail (

What to put into the envelope?

1 ) Print the text above the word ACTION in  this article, in 2 page only (click(–>) File from the browser-> Print Preview;  choose a convenient scale (125%) so that the printed text is in 2  page only–>Print; choose the page 1–>OK). And idem to print the page 2 at the back of the page 1. That’s enough to know the topic of this text.

2) Last step: add to the previous printed page some leaflets about islam.

A 0.70€ regular stamp for a 20 g-postage in the Euro-Zone allows  2 sheets, 4 pages, printed back and front, in the envelope. To the page(s) already printed you can fill up the remaining space with one or more of the following arguments:

All Islam in 2 pages: (there is  a link to print on each page)

An other Australian leaflet in 2 pages: (there is  a link to print on each page)

The letter to mankind  from Ali Sina (2 pages): (click(–>) File from the browser-> Print Preview;  choose a convenient scale (90%) –>Print; choose the  page 1–>OK. Idem for page 2. Print it on the back of page 1).

Presentation of the psychology of Muslims (1 page or 2) (click(–>) File from the browser-> Print Preview;  choose a convenient scale (100%) –>Print; choose the page 1–>OK. You possibly do the same for the page 2 by printing it on the reverse of page 1).

A Steph Bergol’s picture (a small picture is worth a thousand words to complement a SITA action of 4 pages at most. (click(–>) the picture you chose –> File from the browser-> Print Preview;  choose a convenient scale (100%) –>Print; choose the right page to print–>OK).

Who are the recipients of the letters?

1)  Councillor David Ashton (Leader of the Council), c/o Harrow Council, Civic Centre, Station Road, Harrow HA1 2XG


2) Councillor Marilyn Ashcroft, Planning Department, 3rd Floor, Civic Centre, Station Road, Harrow, HA1 2UY

WATCH: no insult and no threat in a SITA mail.Your SITA mail is ready, you have just to stamp and post it. If you like you may also learn more about SITA

Information about SITA: To know more about the SITA concept and  SITA actions read the SITA kit at this page:

You have an envelope, a stamp, then you have the   POWER... … … … … … … … …It’s to say your opinion to any public entity.

Propulsé par